WASHINGTON (CNN) — When Rep. Joe Wilson yelled “You lie!” at President Obama, the South Carolina Republican’s political team quickly launched an online strategy to capitalize on the incident.

Wilson’s heated outburst came on the House floor as Obama addressed a joint session of Congress about health care.

Within 12 hours, Wilson media consultant Brian Donahue had sketched out a plan that included buying ads on Google, cutting videos on YouTube and using Twitter and Facebook to raise money and counter the congressman’s critics.

“We knew that influencers and news outlets would want to find out more information about what happened and what Joe Wilson’s response was, and they would be looking for this information online,” Donahue told CNN. “The events were happening by the minute and by the hour. Online was where we needed to be to respond and provide new information from Congressman Wilson. Traditional print media couldn’t keep up with the pace of this issue.”

At the same time, Democrats and liberal organizations seized on the incident to raise money for Wilson’s likely Democratic opponent in 2010, Rob Miller.

Leading the effort was liberal fundraising site ActBlue, which launched a campaign on Twitter and other social networks to raise money for Miller. Twitter was responsible for 11,000 clicks to ActBlue’s portal for donations to the campaign online.

While Miller wrote blog posts for Web sites such as the Huffington Post and Daily Kos, his campaign focused on the South Carolina press corps. National fundraising efforts were mostly left to outside groups.

“He really stayed focused on what he needed to do in South Carolina and what his plan was as a candidate,” said Jennifer Crider, communications director for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

South Carolina political operative Wesley Donehue handled the state and local political strategy for Wilson.

The morning after Wilson blasted Obama, his campaign purchased Google AdWords, with search terms applicable to the previous night, that would lead searchers to the congressman’s campaign Web site.

“The campaigns of both Joe [Wilson] and his opponent, Rob Miller, leaped to place AdWords ads on searches for ‘Joe Wilson,’ ” Google spokesman Galen Panger wrote in an e-mail.

Panger noted that it was “one of the fastest responses we’ve seen to date” for an individual or organization to purchase AdWords after a breaking news event.

Panger added that other political advertisers included the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, TheMiddleClass.org and the House Conservatives Fund.

In addition, the Wilson campaign bought advertising on approximately 25 different Web sites including Google, Yahoo, Bing, DrudgeReport, Town Hall, Red State and a handful of sites with a South Carolina focus, the campaign said.

Within 24 hours of Wilson’s outburst, Donahue hired the David All Group, a conservative consulting firm known for its expertise in weaving together politics and social networking.

By 4:07 p.m. ET Thursday, @CongJoeWilson, Wilson’s campaign Twitter account, sent out its first tweet.

“Thank you all for your understanding and support,” Wilson wrote. “I’m on Sean Hannity radio now. Listen in.”

Wilson also used Twitvid, a Twitter-based video sharing platform, to share information.

Miller’s first tweet went out at 9:54 p.m. Wednesday, moments after Obama’s speech concluded. @RobMillerUSMC tweeted a link to the campaign Web site.

Throughout the rest of the night, it updated followers with tallies of money raised and also linked to the ActBlue site. His official Facebook account was providing similar updates and increased by more than 2,000 “fans.”

The Miller campaign did not return several calls or e-mails to discuss its online strategy. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokeswoman Jessica Santillo, calling on behalf of the Miller campaign, said, “The campaign does not discuss strategy.”

As for Wilson, David All said the congressman has picked up 10,000 followers on his Twitter account and 16,000 new Facebook “friends.”

“Twitter is not the end all, be all, but it proved to be another tool to help us achieve our online goals,” All wrote in an e-mail. “We used it to share information with influencers, help shape the debate, listen to the conversation as a real-time focus group to gauge our response, set the tone that we were fighting back with social media, and to essentially get our side of the story out.”

Wilson’s campaign team created three YouTube videos and released them September 10, 13 and 15. In total, the videos have been viewed more than 284,000 times.

“People needed to hear directly from Congressman Wilson,” Donahue said. “So we created Web videos which carried Congressman Wilson’s responses, from him directly speaking to online audiences. These videos were quickly picked up by several major TV news outlets [and] had a massive impact online and on traditional mediums.”

Miller did not use his YouTube account. As of Monday, the last video update made by Miller’s campaign team was about a year ago.

Barbara Dybwad, senior editor for the social media news blog Mashable.com, said the nation has reached a point where politicians need to factor social media into their strategic thinking.

“It leaves the candidate a choice: either engage [on social networks] or lose,” Dybwad said.

If there is one thing that TV stations can count on as the nation’s slowly pulls out of the current recession, it’s political advertising, says Evan Tracey, who closely tracks spending by candidates and advocacy groups for TNS Media Intelligence.

Driven by issue advertising surrounding the health care and cap-and-trade debates on Capitol Hill, he says, the political category could generate as much as $1 billion for TV stations and networks this year — a record for the usually weak first year of the four-year political advertising cycle.

And the pace of spending will not abate in year two of that cycle, he says. In 2010, TV spending will track that of 2006 and 2008 and end up between $2.4 billion and $2.6 billion. “There is plenty of fuel for this fire.”

Tracey’s forecasts were welcomed news for the revenue-deprived broadcasters gathered today in New York for the annual TVB Forecast Conference.

This year, issue spending could top $700 million as advocacy groups try to stop or influence the health care and cap-and-trade legislation, he says. Just how big the number ends up will depend in large part in how the legislation proceeds, he says. The longer the debate goes, he says, the more will be spent.

So far, about a third of the issue money has been spent with broadcast and cable networks, Tracey says. But that will change as Congress gets closer to passing legislation, he adds.

The advocacy groups will begin targeting key legislators — conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans — by buying time on stations in their home states, he says. “When it comes down to getting [Sen.] Olympia Snowe’s vote, that money is going to Maine.”

TV stations should also benefit from two competitive gubernatorial races in New York and Virginia and more than 600 races for mayor and other local offices, Tracey says. They could bring in $120 million for TV stations.

Also contributing to the 2009 take will be early starts on 2010 campaigns, he says. A dozen candidates running for office next year are already on the air, he says.

Unlike 2009, spending in 2010 will be driven by elections at all levels. The 37 gubernatorial campaigns will produce the most advertising. In addition, many of the Senate seats and as many as 100 House seats could be competitive and thus generate heavy spending.

Because of the controversy surrounding President Obama’s aggressive agenda, incumbent candidates will be “skittish” heading into next year’s elections and will be spending early and often to secure their reelections, Tracey says. The elections will be a referendum on Obama’s health care initiative and his first two years in office.

One other factor that broadcaster should be aware of is the campaign finance case — Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce — now before the Supreme Court, Tracey says. Some believe the high court will use the case to lift restrictions on political spending by corporations. If that happens, he says, “it will open up the floodgates for any corporate money that wants to come into the elections.”